On 16-2-2017 5:45, Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Ok, well, I cut way back on the number streams and finally got a finished
> render. There's only 10 streams in this one.
>

Like you said, with no provision for erosion, the streams here seem more 
artificial then from above, running over the (lowest point) surface. 
Nonetheless, it is impressive in my eyes! I am eager to experiment with 
your code. I just downloaded it, thanks.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message