|
 |
Am 05.12.2016 um 17:24 schrieb omniverse:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
>> Am 05.12.2016 um 13:47 schrieb omniverse:
>>
>> I give you another hint: This is how it looks with the height_field set
>> to "no_image" ;)
>
> Okay, now that would scare me. Just how convoluted is the source code anyway?
> Wait, don't answer that, I probably don't want to know and couldn't understand
> anyhow!
To the contrary, it didn't scare me in the least -- it just confirmed my
guess: Turns out I just got the test for all the "no_whatever" flags
backwards.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
