Am 03.12.2016 um 17:50 schrieb omniverse:
> Perhaps a curiosity of how the dot operator actually works, maybe x.x will be
> possible?
> Trying that here, this seemed to bypass the problem with abs() seeing a "vector
> or color expression".
> I sure don't know the reasoning myself, just occurred to me it might remove the
> vectorness in a way it does a whole vector.

Yes, `x.x` is a valid expression -- but since it evaluates to the
constant `1`, there are easier ways to write it ;)

With that in mind, I have a hunch that `x.x` isn't what Ian intended...

Post a reply to this message