On 7/31/2016 7:52 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 30-7-2016 14:31, Stephen wrote:

>>
>> On the other hand. These old tomes are heavy and bulky. But for some
>> books you need the smell of foxing. :)
>
> Who cares, I like the struggling with those old volumes fighting back by
> breaking at the spine, refusing to open correctly, showing printing
> errors... and I do /not/ mistreat them at all. ;-)  Fortunately, my wife
> has some book binding skills so the damage can be repaired when necessary.
>

Fortune, indeed.

I, on the other hand, have gone to the dark side. :)


>> I don't think the scorpion will work. It would either look stupid
>> standing on its hind legs or be six feet high and twenty feet long.
>> I have a dragon with gossamer wings. That should be a challenge.
>
> Dragon Lady then. I wonder how the scorpion in the book would show.
>

Now I will need to read the book. :)
I am trying to df3-ise a dragon model but I am running into problems 
with the textures in the model. If any of my experiments look 
interesting I will post the results.



>>
>> That is one of the most stupid weapons imagined. Zelazny would have done
>> better.
>
> Ha! Yes indeed! It is the most awkward thing imaginable and pretty
> useless if you ask me except for keeping in the way when not called for.
>

You would need reinforced pockets that's for sure.


>> No but it did raise the standard overall. It seems to have dropped back
>> a bit now. </ Good old days rant>
>>
>
> That is true. I am a bit out of touch with the post-2000 vintage though.
>

Me too.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message