|
 |
Le 24/07/2016 18:32, clipka a écrit :
> Am 24.07.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Bald Eagle:
>> clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
>>
>>>> Any suggestion of name for that container ?
>>>
>>> "nurbs_mesh"?
>>
>> If it's a closed 3d shape composed of NURBS mesh(es), then maybe "envelope" to
>> differentiate and disambiguate from a (simple) open mesh?
>
> Sounds far too vague and unrelated. Besides, I think it would be smart
> to also support non-closed NURBS patch meshes, just like mesh also
> supports non-closed triangle meshes.
>
"package", "bundle", "parcel", "lot", "bunch" ?????
On the same way as mesh supports flat triangle and smooth triangle, I do not see why
the "object" holding nurbs couldn't also hold other 2D finite primitives.
To the risk of getting another (bad & slow) kind of mesh (as a collection of
triangles).
nurbs, bicubic_patch... may be some other objects could also be added ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
