Am 24.07.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Bald Eagle:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
>
>>> Any suggestion of name for that container ?
>>
>> "nurbs_mesh"?
>
> If it's a closed 3d shape composed of NURBS mesh(es), then maybe "envelope" to
> differentiate and disambiguate from a (simple) open mesh?
Sounds far too vague and unrelated. Besides, I think it would be smart
to also support non-closed NURBS patch meshes, just like mesh also
supports non-closed triangle meshes.
Post a reply to this message
|
