El 20/07/16 a las 13:43, clipka escribió:
> Hmm... maybe that's due to the top layer in the file access
> (ITextStream, the one where the buffer used to reside in) now using
> polymorphism. Still, it puzzles me a bit why the copying-around of
> the macro content does so little to counteract that penalty. Might
> even have to do with CPU properties.

   AMD FX-6300 here...

> Since this 3.6% performance loss on your machine buys a 12%
> performance bonus on Thomas' machine, I guess I'm willing to pay that
> price.
>

   Well, it's still a little loss compared to the huge gain respect to
the old macros mechanism. Good job!

--
jaime

Post a reply to this message