El 18/07/16 a las 23:05, clipka escribió:
> Am 18.07.2016 um 19:49 schrieb Jaime Vives Piqueres:
>
>>    Ok, revised results with "everything inside" (copy-paste of 3 macros
>> from rand.inc"):
>>
>>    current alpha : 1m20s
>>    previous alpha: 1m20s
>
> What happens if you put >512 bytes between the macro declarations and
> the place where they're invoked?

   Nothing... still 1m20s.


>>    kinda logical, isn't?
>
> No, not necessarily.
>
> With the new version, macros are always executed from the cache (unless
> they're larger than 64k), while previously they were executed from
> buffered file access. The two approaches involve different types of
> overhead, so I'd normally expect them to actually result in at least
> slightly different execution times.
>

   The difference must be really small in this case then...

--
jaime

Post a reply to this message