El 18/07/16 a las 13:55, clipka escribió:
> I presume the "inside" is still with the random macros residing in
> "rand.inc", right?

   Yes...

> Remember that under those conditions, that's still mostly a test of
> the "outside" macros.

   Ok, will try a more "pure inside" test later.

> Note that "subsequent runs" on Windows means the executable isn't
> terminated between runs. On Linux, the closest equivalent would be
> subsequent frames in an animation.

   Ah... then I just traced a few frames: the first took 1m20s, and
subsequent ones took 1m24s. Not a big increase.

--
jaime

Post a reply to this message