El 11/04/16 a las 23:05, Jérôme M. Berger escribió:
> 	Well strictly speaking, you're missing a pair of parentheses around the
> 2*EPSILON. They should make it easier to tweak your parameters (for one
> thing you can probably replace the 1000000000 with 10 which makes for
> less unwieldy values).

Ouch! Corrected... but now the multiplier has to be around 0.0000005.

>
> 	That being said, the result you got here is pretty good. Keep up the
> good work!

   Thanks!

--
jaime

Post a reply to this message