|
 |
On 8-4-2016 8:17, And wrote:
> Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote:
>> Hard names aside, might it be more logical to write it like this
>>
>> diffuse {<amount> method <bla> roughness <x> ...}
>>
>> similar to e.g. how reflection or media parameters are grouped.
>> Supported parameters depend on the method, and if it makes sense
>> to have e.g. a roughness parameter for multiple methods it can
>> have different range / interpretation depending on method).
>>
>> You can also make method name lambert explicit this way except
>> method lambert will be default anyway.
>
> I vote this.
>
Yes, me too.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
