POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Experimental alternative diffuse models : Re: Experimental alternative diffuse models Server Time
19 May 2024 17:03:52 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Experimental alternative diffuse models  
From: Christian Froeschlin
Date: 7 Apr 2016 17:22:34
Message: <5706cf9a$1@news.povray.org>
Hard names aside, might it be more logical to write it like this

   diffuse {<amount> method <bla> roughness <x> ...}

similar to e.g. how reflection or media parameters are grouped.
Supported parameters depend on the method, and if it makes sense
to have e.g. a roughness parameter for multiple methods it can
have different range / interpretation depending on method).

You can also make method name lambert explicit this way except
method lambert will be default anyway.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.