|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
El 07/04/16 a las 15:52, clipka escribió:
> I wouldn't use altitude, just the plain slope.
>
> Given that the slope pattern is a lot faster than any proximity
> pattern, I think it should be worth another try.
>
But just plain "slope y" shows foam also on "valley" parts of the
surface, not only on the crests. Or are you suggestion another approach?
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |