> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>
>> I discarded that one without testing it first, because in my mind
>> it sounded way too slow to render.
>
> Can you do the difference, convert it to a mesh, and THEN render it?

   I would kill for a simple way to do that... converting isosurfaces to
meshes.

> Maybe use a heightfield?

   I thought about making it with several hf's rotated around, but it
would still lack the "overhangs" that isosurfaces allow.

--
jaime

Post a reply to this message