On 2/21/2016 1:28 PM, Alain wrote:
> Le 16-02-21 02:16, clipka a écrit :
>> Am 20.02.2016 um 22:51 schrieb Mike Horvath:
>>> On 2/20/2016 3:54 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>>>>     Mike, I don't want to sound rude, but I wonder why you think it
>>>> would
>>>> be easier or faster to ask these questions here instead searching on
>>>> google... seriously, I'm totally perplexed at the logic behind it. I
>>>> just did these searches and obtained the answers in a matter of
>>>> seconds:
>>>>
>>>> 1. https://help.sketchup.com/en/article/3000049
>>>> 2. no, in regards to redistribution (from the above article)
>>>> 3. http://www.povray.org/news/index.php#292
>>>
>>> I read #1 twice now, and still don't understand. Hence, why I asked.
>>> Could you explain that Terms of Use for me? Thanks.
>>
>> What makes you think anyone here is better at understanding legalese
>> than yourself?
>>
>> You should really ask lawyers about that one, not 3D hobbyists ;)
>>
>
> "legalese" is the bane of common sence. It use obtuse phase constructs
> and unusual words used in unusual context to willfully obfuscate the
> real meaning of the author. It also uselessly inflate the text.
> It's great to hide a lack of knowlege, fogged mindset, and contempt of
> the readers.
> It's a "language" made by lawers for lawers to help justify having to
> many lawers.

What? You can never have too many lawyers!

Mike

Post a reply to this message