Le 16-01-18 23:49, Mike Horvath a écrit :
> Here's a stereoscopic version, since I got my stereoscope in the mail
> this week. I used StereoPhoto Maker to assemble the image.
>
> I am disappointed that:
>
> 1. The printed images are so small. If I print them larger, then they
> are out of focus due to the magnification of the lenses.
> 2. At small sizes, the printed images are not very crisp. Maybe taking
> the images to a photo lab will produce better results than my desktop
> printer.
> 3. The colors are much darker when printed than in the program preview.
> 4. I'm still not sure if I should make the cameras converge on a single
> point or not. I'm not sure which is better.
> 5. If I mess with the paper orientation in the printer dialog, then the
> images get cropped or misaligned in weird ways, wasting paper and ink.
> It's better to stick with the defaults I guess.
> 6. The program doesn't label the left and right source images, so I
> forget which is which. Because of this I don't know for sure whether the
> stereoscope uses the cross-eyed method or not.
> 7. I can't figure out how to resize the program window so that I can
> preview the images using the stereoscope before printing.
>
> Otherwise, the experience was okay, and did not require a lot of
> preparation or configuration to get good results.
>
>
> Mike

Parallel view. It print small so that it'spossible to view that way.
If you print larger, then, you'll need mirrors to compensate for the 
larger size.

Print using the highest DPI setting available. Home printers should be 
able to go up to 1400 DPI or more without problem.

Having convergence or not is dependent on the scale of the scene.
Converging for compact, close up images.
Non-converging for vast scenes like this one.

Flip the images and print at a larger size for cross-eyed view.



Alain

Alain

Post a reply to this message