|
 |
Am 04.01.2016 um 07:55 schrieb Theogott:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
>> Am 03.01.2016 um 23:09 schrieb Theogott:
>>> This is a funny thing. We all know that AA takes time. But sooo much?
>>>
>>> The scene below renders <1 Second here, without AA.
>>> If i turn on AA 0.3, it renders ... forever ... ~1 hr.
>>
>> Not sure what brutish computer you have at your disposal, but even
>> without AA I don't see render times anywhere close to 1s here. More like
>> a bit under 4 minutes with POV-Ray 3.6.
>>
>> For some reason, POV-Ray 3.7 seems to grind to a halt -- possibly
>> because its handling of max_trace_level with regards to fully
>> transparent surfaces is different.
...
> Render Options
> Quality: 5
Ah - now THAT does make a difference!
Running with the "+Q5" command-line option, I get 1s render time, too.
But even then activating AA doesn't change the render times drastically.
> UberPOV finished
You didn't mention that fact either.
> There seems to be a huge Difference in Rendertime between Uber-POV and POV-Ray.
> WHY?
Is there? I don't see any. Not with identical command-line settings, at
any rate.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
