On 19-12-2015 13:32, clipka wrote:
> Am 19.12.2015 um 09:41 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 12/19/2015 8:07 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 18-12-2015 9:09, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>> On 18-12-2015 7:39, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>>>>> Yes, this stuff is exciting!
>>>>>
>>>>> And even better, "Negative Gravity" has been located already in space,
>>>>> at an asteroid nearby:
>>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=Asteroid+Negative+Gravity
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would call that "centripetal force" ;-)
>>>>
>>> Ouch! "centrifugal" of course :-)
>>>
>>
>> No, you were right the first time. ;-)
>
> Actually, that depends on what "that" is supposed to denote:
>
> "that" = (negative) "gravity": (negative) "centripetal force".
>
> "that" = "negative gravity": (positive) "centrifugal force".
>

Well, in last resort, I meant the second one ;-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message