|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:08:55 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 7/6/2015 4:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Heh.
>>
>>
> Ho!
>
>> Like it or not, though, for technical writing, there are two style
>> guides that are the standards - the Microsoft guide, and the IBM guide.
>>
>>
> Is that an accepted international standard? You are the expert, be
> honest. ;-)
It is. :)
> Remember you are talking to a dyslectic. And I have no standards. I
> worked for multi national Oil companied. Showing I have no morals,
> either.
LOL
>> Microsoft is more commonly used in software AIUI, though the IBM guide
>> is, I think, more established.
>>
>> Microsoft defers to the Chicago Manual of Style for most non-technology
>> things, and Chicago (interestingly) defers to Eric S. Raymond's "Jargon
>> file" section on writing.
>
> Sorry! is it my turn?
> Oxford Circus.
Ipswitch.
--
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |