POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : RSoCP by UberPOV : Re: RSoCP by UberPOV Server Time
7 Nov 2024 15:32:53 EST (-0500)
  Re: RSoCP by UberPOV  
From: Thomas de Groot
Date: 26 Jun 2015 10:36:09
Message: <558d6359$1@news.povray.org>
On 26-6-2015 14:43, clipka wrote:
> Am 26.06.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>
>> I had not paid enough attention to the (mutual) exclusion of fresnel and
>> metallic (RTFRules!). Forgot also to add conserve_energy.
>
> Don't worry, that's only relevant for transparent objects.
>
>>        specular albedo 0.5
>>        roughness 0.001
>>        brilliance 3, 3
>>        reflection {
>>          0.0, 1.0
>
> Now what did I say about the specular and reflection brightness settings?!
>
> Use "specular albedo N" where N is the same as the maximum reflection.
> That's what I said.
>
> Need a hearing aid, hm? :P
>

What did you say? I don't hear you! ;-)

The thing is, I read what you write and it just doesn't impact where it 
should: "Use "specular albedo N" where N is the maximum reflection 
intensity"; clear enough one should say, except for me of course.

Oh, well...

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.