|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 2-1-2015 15:38, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> On 01/02/2015 04:45 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 1-1-2015 23:32, "Jörg \"Yadgar\" Bleimann" wrote:
>>> A smaller epsilon value also sounds tempting...
>>
>> [hint] That should be easy to implement by the Team shouldn't it? and
>> would solve a lot of related problems ;-) After all, a hack in that
>> sense was made some years ago to accommodate the Ring World.
>
> Thorsten has already addressed this, and it appears (tentatively) to be
> a no-go. See Flyspray #297.
>
Hmmm right. I see. It did help a bit though but seemingly it is not the
ultimate solution. I retract my comment :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |