On 11-12-2014 14:35, Stephen wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 13:10, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 10-12-2014 22:51, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2014 20:16, MichaelJF wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's her bra.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Since you mention it. I don't think that she should wear a bra. She is a
>>> free spirit. Au natural as Nature intended.
>>>
>>
>> Oh but think about all those innocent eyes browsing the internet! You
>> would lead them into frightful temptations (or worse). You don't want to
>> have /that/ responsibility on your conscience, do you? ;-)
>>
>
> 1. What is a conscience?
> 2. Art is the exception and this is art.
> 3. (Thank the Victorians for making the human body taboo) ;-)
>

I have always wondered how some people view the Venus of Milo (for 
instance) or the Laocoon. Probably they don't view them...

Without saying, I entirely agree with your three points. With one 
reservation: I would blame the /bourgeois/ society of that time, not 
necessarily the Victorians alone; and the Church of course.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message