Am 28.08.2014 19:41, schrieb James Holsenback:
> On 08/20/2014 09:40 AM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 20.08.2014 15:26, schrieb James Holsenback:
>>
>>> OTO_Get_Mask
>>> <-8.00000000000000000000,-5.00000000000000000000,0.0000000000000000
>>> 0000> Result:0.99999997764825820923
>>>
>>> Hmmm ... OK I think this shows problem the above is output from inside
>>> the OTO_Get_Mask function ... I now see why reversing the logic (and my
>>> "on a lark" test) in corner test works
>>
>> Bingo!
>>
>> Okay, you obviously have already figured a way around this problem by
>> way of modifying OTOc.inc, and I think I now have enough information to
>> go hunting for the root cause in the codebase.
>>
>> I might come back to you for testing of some code modifications, if
>> that's ok for you.
>>
>
> curious if you've had any time to follow up

Not yet, sorry.

Post a reply to this message