On 08/20/2014 09:40 AM, clipka wrote:
> Am 20.08.2014 15:26, schrieb James Holsenback:
>
>> OTO_Get_Mask
>> <-8.00000000000000000000,-5.00000000000000000000,0.0000000000000000
>> 0000> Result:0.99999997764825820923
>>
>> Hmmm ... OK I think this shows problem the above is output from inside
>> the OTO_Get_Mask function ... I now see why reversing the logic (and my
>> "on a lark" test) in corner test works
>
> Bingo!
>
> Okay, you obviously have already figured a way around this problem by
> way of modifying OTOc.inc, and I think I now have enough information to
> go hunting for the root cause in the codebase.
>
> I might come back to you for testing of some code modifications, if
> that's ok for you.
>

curious if you've had any time to follow up

Post a reply to this message