On 23/08/2014 21:09, William F Pokorny wrote:

> 
> Even getting the color tiles I expect, I still don't understand
> everything about this tiling pattern. I didn't expect the pattern to
> plateau (or perhaps it peaks and recedes) inside the tiles? Rather I
> thought there would be a continued gradient to the center making
> impossible the sensitivity to mathematical noise in the map we see.
> 

the smallest tile (such as in 23) provide the limit for the size of the
calk of all tiles. The inner part, deeper, of other tiles are getting
uniform entry. At best, the smallest one becomes 100% calk, but a part
of the other ones remains (unless they have the same depth).

The calk is parallel to the side of the tile, and it appeared on the
part of the map (so you can have a banded calk around a tile).

> I'll see if tomorrow I can find some time to update so a fractional
> representation map is written to the WriteMap file instead of the fix
> above. Perhaps too adjusting the break points slightly more away from
> the apparent calk/tile edges of the pattern if I can get a better
> understanding of the gradients. Guess I can plot the whole thing as one
> gradient to better see what it is really doing in the tiles.
> 
> Bill P.
> 


-- 
IQ of crossposters with FU: 100 / (number of groups)
IQ of crossposters without FU: 100 / (1 + number of groups)
IQ of multiposters: 100 / ( (number of groups) * (number of groups))

Post a reply to this message