On 08/20/2014 08:29 AM, James Holsenback wrote:
> when I change the corner test to: #if(OTO_Get_Mask(Vec)=0)
>
> things appear to go through the corner test properly (albeit reverse
> logic) and the image renders correctly without the gaps.
>
> OTO_Get_Mask <-8.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
> else: <-8.08857,-4.96521,0.00000>, <-6.81513, -3.69069, 0.00000>
>
> OTO_Get_Mask <-7.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
> if: <-6.81513,-4.96521,0.00000>, <-5.79876, -4.19790, 0.00000>
>
> OTO_Get_Mask <-6.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
> else: <-5.79876,-4.73380,0.00000>, <-4.90749, -4.19790, 0.00000>
>
> OTO_Get_Mask <-5.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
> if: <-4.90749,-4.73380,0.00000>, <-3.96589, -4.33468, 0.00000>
>
> OTO_Get_Mask <-4.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
> else: <-3.96589,-5.17163,0.00000>, <-3.41528, -4.33468, 0.00000>

On a lark I also tried:
#if(OTO_Get_Mask(Vec))

and it works!!!
OTO_Get_Mask <-8.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
if: <-7.69069,-5.08857,0.00000>, <-6.96521, -3.81513, 0.00000>

OTO_Get_Mask <-7.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
else: <-6.96521,-4.79876,0.00000>, <-6.19790, -3.81513, 0.00000>

OTO_Get_Mask <-6.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
if: <-6.19790,-4.79876,0.00000>, <-4.73380, -3.90749, 0.00000>

OTO_Get_Mask <-5.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
else: <-4.73380,-4.96589,0.00000>, <-4.33468, -3.90749, 0.00000>

OTO_Get_Mask <-4.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
if: <-4.33468,-4.96589,0.00000>, <-3.17163, -4.41528, 0.00000>

I'm confused now ... aren't

#if(OTO_Get_Mask(Vec)=1)

and

#if(OTO_Get_Mask(Vec))

functionally the same?

Post a reply to this message