|
 |
On 08/19/2014 09:14 AM, clipka wrote:
> Am 19.08.2014 13:07, schrieb James Holsenback:
>
>> Geez ... I never said I fixed it, and I'm getting rather bored with this
>> back and forth. There's a problem ... fix it or don't.
>
> I'd really like to fix it, but I need your help to diagnose the problem,
> because I really can't reproduce it here, and at present I know of
> nobody else who can.
>
> Running the tests I described in my previous post should be a matter of
> just a few minutes, and might tell me more about the problem than all
> the back and forth so far.
>
> So please help me a bit more with this.
>
> ... pretty please?
>
I added some debug in OTO_Get_Mask like this:
#macro OTO_Get_Mask(Cell)
#local CX = Cell.x;
#local CY = Cell.y;
#local Result = OTO_FMask(CX,CY,0);
#debug concat ("OTO_Get_Mask <",vstr(3,Cell,",",2,4),">
Result:",str(Result,2,4),"\n")
OTO_FMask(CX,CY,0)
#end
and it produced the following output:
OTO_Get_Mask <-8.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-8.08857,-4.96521,0.00000>, <-6.81513, -3.69069, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-7.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
else: <-6.96521,-4.79876,0.00000>, <-6.19790, -3.81513, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-6.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-5.79876,-4.73380,0.00000>, <-4.90749, -4.19790, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-5.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
else: <-4.73380,-4.96589,0.00000>, <-4.33468, -3.90749, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-4.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-3.96589,-5.17163,0.00000>, <-3.41528, -4.33468, 0.00000>
the 1st group shows a "Result" of 1 and it improperly falls into the
else clause (yep got that backwards in previous post ... tired, dyslexia
acting up) ... but notice in the 2nd group that even tho "Result" is 0
(inside the OTO_Get_Mask macro) it /still/ falls into the else clause
I also used:
#local OTO_FMask = function{ pattern{ pigment_pattern{ color 1.0 } } }
with these results:
OTO_Get_Mask <-8.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-8.08857,-4.96521,0.00000>, <-6.81513, -3.69069, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-7.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-6.96521,-4.79876,0.00000>, <-6.19790, -3.81513, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-6.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-5.79876,-4.73380,0.00000>, <-4.90749, -4.19790, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-5.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-4.73380,-4.96589,0.00000>, <-4.33468, -3.90749, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-4.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-3.96589,-5.17163,0.00000>, <-3.41528, -4.33468, 0.00000>
so it would seem that no matter what OTO_Get_Mask returns, it's /always/
falling into the else clause.
when I change the corner test to: #if(OTO_Get_Mask(Vec)=0)
things appear to go through the corner test properly (albeit reverse
logic) and the image renders correctly without the gaps.
OTO_Get_Mask <-8.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-8.08857,-4.96521,0.00000>, <-6.81513, -3.69069, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-7.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
if: <-6.81513,-4.96521,0.00000>, <-5.79876, -4.19790, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-6.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-5.79876,-4.73380,0.00000>, <-4.90749, -4.19790, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-5.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:0.0000
if: <-4.90749,-4.73380,0.00000>, <-3.96589, -4.33468, 0.00000>
OTO_Get_Mask <-4.0000,-5.0000,0.0000> Result:1.0000
else: <-3.96589,-5.17163,0.00000>, <-3.41528, -4.33468, 0.00000>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
