On 08/18/2014 08:18 AM, clipka wrote:
> Am 17.08.2014 10:47, schrieb James Holsenback:
>
>>> If I understand you correctly, you're saying that with issue #29 fixes
>>> in place commit 7502593 works while cf1c3fb doesn't. Is that right?
>>
>> ac564f7 was the last time I was able to compile and run OTOTest file
>> correctly ... cf1c3fb wouldn't even compile. jumped to af80da4 (the last
>> issue #29) commit and it compiled fine but OTOTest file problem showed
>> up again
>
> Please note that the Git version history isn't linear: It has different
> branches that split and merge; and while ac564f7 is the last commit
> before cf1c3fb, it was done on a different branch, and so the immediate
> predecessor of cf1c3fb is the earlier commit 7502593. (Likewise, the
> later commit 914fff1 is a direct successor of ac564f7 but not of
> cf1c3fb, and is therefore likely to both compile and run OTOTest file.)
>
> The following commits are still suspects for having broken OTOTest (in
> reverse chronological order):
>
>      cf1c3fb
>      7502593
>      2a2d1a8
>      2a41f04
>
> 7502593 is comparatively unlikely to be the culprit, as it just merges
> bugfix cc24c62, which was also merged into the other branch leading to
> ac564f7 and apparently didn't do any damage there.
>
> 2a2d1a8 is about as hot a candidate as cf1c3fb - probably even more so,
> as it is all about vectors and therefore relative position of items,
> while cf1c3fb is about blend maps (colour maps, pigment maps, normal
> maps etc.), which do not have any intrinsic relative positional
> component to them.
>
> 2a41f04 is a hot candidate for having caused GitHub issue #29, but
> shouldn't have brought about any functional changes, so I suspect it
> will run fine with the issue #29 fixes applied.
>

OK ... this goes to some of my confusion. I'd suspected as much. Thanks 
for the sanity check!

When I downloaded source(s) I used the "clone" url, so I was pulling a 
snapshot of the entire branch (not just individual changes) at that 
commit, then doing separate builds for each. Give me some time to 
further narrow it down.

Appreciate your indulgence.

Post a reply to this message