|
|
On 2014-07-31 9:04 AM, scott wrote:
>> It's weird how the binary summation seems so natural. Maybe I just do
>> WAY too
>> much computer stuff.
>
> Indeed, or immediately I saw the "8196" in the OP and thought "that's a
> typo" :-)
Indeed. I hang my head in shame. :-(
(I did get it right on the second occurrence of the number though)
A hex version of 2048 would be delightfully geeky - especially of the
tiles were labeled 0x2, 0x4, 0x8, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80, 0x100, etc.
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|