|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 04.01.2014 20:36, schrieb jhu:
>> Even if it is twice as fast, it doesn't sound cost-effective to spend
>> $37k for 64 cores if you can get an equivalent system but with 32
>> cores for $10k, because you could get three of the 32 core ones (and
>> still have cash to spare) for that price. So instead of 64 cores you
>> then have 96.
>>
>> -- Chris
>
> For running multiple VMs, you would be correct. For running Povray, not so much.
We're working on that one :-)
That said, you should probably ask yourself how fast you really need
your render results, and whether you'll be running all your renders
strictly sequential.
For instance, if you're working on some detail and want to see it from
three perspectives, you can just as well run those three renders in
parallel, rather than sequentially.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |