|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:54:53 +0100, "Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de>
wrote:
>> if the behaviour is reproduced with other software then it could be compiler,
>> if it wasn't reproduced who knows where is bug ?
>
> What kind of logic is that? The probability that any other program will
> also change the color output in the same way POV-Ray does (provided the
> program has not at least been derived from the POV-Ray source code) is zero.
I'm not talking about result "changing of color". I talk about result "not
expected". Perhaps wrong meaning is result of my english. If my affraid is not
logic why in beta-testing should we add compiler version in reports? Are there
bugs showed by intel compiler not visible before?
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |