POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.international : [de] "Rotstich durch Fehler in Intels C++-Compiler" : Re: [en] Re: [de] "Rotstich durch Fehler in Intels C++-Compiler" Server Time
27 Jul 2024 16:13:34 EDT (-0400)
  Re: [en] Re: [de] "Rotstich durch Fehler in Intels C++-Compiler"  
From:
Date: 13 Nov 2001 08:18:59
Message: <5172vtkmb7hn1nkm7cl7nnhjeacflqqj0m@4ax.com>
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:54:53 +0100, "Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde>
wrote:

>> if the behaviour is reproduced with other software then it could be compiler,
>> if it wasn't reproduced who knows where is bug ?
>
> What kind of logic is that?  The probability that any other program will
> also change the color output in the same way POV-Ray does (provided the
> program has not at least been derived from the POV-Ray source code) is zero.

I'm not talking about result "changing of color". I talk about result "not
expected". Perhaps wrong meaning is result of my english. If my affraid is not
logic why in beta-testing should we add compiler version in reports? Are there
bugs showed by intel compiler not visible before?

ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.