> What I mean is that the language construct:
>
>      object {
>          pigment { ... }
>          ...
>      }
>
> is NOT internally expanded to
>
>      object {
>          texture { pigment { ... } }
>          ...
>      }
>
> and then further processed. Rather, the two statements just happen to
> generate the same internal data.

Isn't texture part of material though? I always thought writing 
pigment{...} by itself was just a shortcut for 
material{texture{pigment{...}}} (and texture{...} a shortcut for 
material{texture{...}})

Post a reply to this message