|
 |
Am 17.01.2013 08:03, schrieb Kenneth:
> "Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>>
>> Motion blur is (yet) another trick on my to-play-with list...
>>
>> Bill
>
> My simple averaging method is the 'poor man's way'--it doesn't at all reproduce
> the 'photographic film' look of, say, a very bright light smeared across the
> frame. In such a case, the smear would be equally bright from beginning to end.
> In my case, the darker background of previous/later frames is averaged with each
> frame's bright 'static' light pool. The result is a 'different', not
> quite-so-bright smear. But it still looks pretty cool.
If you'd use OpenEXR for the interim output, you could also get that
bright light smear right.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
