On 01/05/2012 4:36 PM, peter puzzelaar wrote:
>
> Adding keyword "sturm" solved the issue.
Good.
> So adding an image seems redundant now...
>
It does indeed :-)
> I assume sturmian root solver (?) is needed for quadratic_spline only as this
> one results in non-smooth transitions at the intermediate points. (as
> cubic_spline did not need the sturmian solver)
>
I don't think so. I use it for all types but maybe I am being over
cautious. To me the noise always seems to be in line with the horizon.
Anyway with today's fast computers I never notice any difference in time
taken.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|