|
|
On 25/04/2012 04:37, Stephen wrote:
> On 24/04/2012 7:10 PM, Chris Cason wrote:
>> That certainly does sound like the memory wasn't released back to the
>> heap. Thanks for the heads-up, I'll try to duplicate it.
>
> Although the file is 840 MB it compresses to 169 MB so I could always
> split it and send it via Big File Transfer, or the like.
Thanks for the offer, I don't expect that's needed though - I would
suspect the issue isn't related to the content. You could try a
different (but similarly large) file to see if it happens with that too.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|