On 23/04/2012 3:30 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 23.04.2012 16:09, schrieb Stephen:


>> *exp(-0.5*z*z) )) }
>
> Should have worked, maybe you missed a z somewhere.
>

I had so many Zeds in it that I almost fell asleep. :-)

> The more robust approach is to leave your function as-is, and call it
> from another function such as:
>
> function { foo(x,y,z-2) }

That makes sense and it's a good idea.
Thanks

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message