On 03/21/2012 12:59 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 21.03.2012 16:23, schrieb James Holsenback:
>
>> Thanks Stephen ... that narrows it down a bit. I looked in revision
>> control and didn't see anything photon related, so perhaps that
>> eliminates the obvious. At the very least I think we've proven that
>> something is fishy. I'm going to submit a bug report.
>
> Guess what - while implementing the new fancy iridescence, someone
> (cough) accidently treaded on photons-relevant code and broke it.
>
> Found, fixed & filed.

yep ... pulled change and we be good to go now.

Post a reply to this message