Am 21.03.2012 16:23, schrieb James Holsenback:

> Thanks Stephen ... that narrows it down a bit. I looked in revision
> control and didn't see anything photon related, so perhaps that
> eliminates the obvious. At the very least I think we've proven that
> something is fishy. I'm going to submit a bug report.

Guess what - while implementing the new fancy iridescence, someone 
(cough) accidently treaded on photons-relevant code and broke it.

Found, fixed & filed.

Post a reply to this message