|
|
On 03/21/2012 11:47 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 21/03/2012 3:23 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>> Thanks Stephen ... that narrows it down a bit. I looked in revision
>> control and didn't see anything photon related, so perhaps that
>> eliminates the obvious. At the very least I think we've proven that
>> something is fishy. I'm going to submit a bug report.
>
> As an aside Jim, I tried to look up "SSLT" in the index of the help
> documents. Nothing was found, I had to look up "subsurface". Maybe an
> additional entry in the index would be useful.
>
yep ... good idea
Post a reply to this message
|
|