> On 03/05/2012 03:16 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 05/03/2012 7:12 PM, Alain wrote:
>>> The SSLT in RC4 let the actual pigment show, while, with the RC3
>>> version, it was totaly ignored. The appareant colour was totaly
>>> determined by the SSLT parameters.
>>> This explain the huge difference between the RC3 and RC4 results.
>>
>> Yes, you are not wrong. :-)
>>
>
> And that's why (IMHO) RC4 method is by far better :-) True enough it's a
> slightly different learning curve (witness my struggles with the rose
> petals) ... in essence we are talking apples and oranges here when
> trying to compare the two methods.

Not comparing apples and oranges, it's rather like comparing apples and 
letuce...



Alain

Post a reply to this message