On 03/05/2012 03:16 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 7:12 PM, Alain wrote:
>> The SSLT in RC4 let the actual pigment show, while, with the RC3
>> version, it was totaly ignored. The appareant colour was totaly
>> determined by the SSLT parameters.
>> This explain the huge difference between the RC3 and RC4 results.
>
> Yes, you are not wrong. :-)
>

And that's why (IMHO) RC4 method is by far better :-) True enough it's a 
slightly different learning curve (witness my struggles with the rose 
petals) ... in essence we are talking apples and oranges here when 
trying to compare the two methods.

Post a reply to this message