On 01/15/2012 09:19 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> I tried map_type 8 and it parsed ok fine ... but get this I also tried> map_type 10 then map_type 100 and those BOTH parsed as well!!!>> A separate bug from what you've uncovered???
added bug report for this:
http://bugs.povray.org/task/232?project=2&order=id&sort=desc
@Stephen: I'll leave the other bug report for you to follow up