Am 26.06.2011 13:53, schrieb Thorsten Froehlich:

> Because it is an explanation for non-programmers. Notice how he does
> *not* say that errors of the addition add up - because there is no
> addition, it is of course a multiplication.

You're right here, Thorsten - my bad. Just checked the code again, and 
it does indeed compute the clock using a non-iterative formula - based 
on a low-precision clockDelta though.

Post a reply to this message