On 25/05/2011 9:18 PM, Alain wrote:

>
>> Thanks :) It's probably too ornate for the doc image; everything else
>> would need a good smattering of detail just to compensate...
>
>
> I tend to agree with that comment. But there is nothing preventing using
> a much more simple desing. A simple one made of circles and rounded
> squares could work well. A small circle, an squared circle and a rounder
> square can look good.
>
>

Or one of Sam's MSets as a heightfield.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message