[after reading Thorten's message above]
... and which shows, there is a semantic problem, difficult to solve in 
fact. Increased by the number of non-native speakers among us.. I have the 
impression that many people (me included) not always realise that Object 
Modifiers is much more than just transformations. :-)  The contained_by in 
isosurfaces is also an object modifier, strictly speaking.

I think that in this case, there should be a little sentence in the docs 
just stressing that all isosurface parameters have to be placed *before* 
any object modifier.

I hope this helps....

Thomas

Post a reply to this message