On 08/03/2011 11:51 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 08.03.2011 20:56, schrieb Orchid XP v8:
>
>> Then again, I tend to think if a system is designed right to start
>> with, backwards compatibility isn't so bad.
>>
>> Unless the thing changes purpose. *Then* backwards compatibility is pure
>> liquid evil! >_<
>
> Now, why would you ever want to /change/ a system, if not to reflect
> certain changes in purpose?

Perhaps to fix something that wasn't quite right before.

> Thus, backwards compatibility is /always/ pure liquid evil :-P

...oh, wait...

Post a reply to this message