|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 08.03.2011 20:56, schrieb Orchid XP v8:
> Then again, I tend to think if a system is designed right to start
> with, backwards compatibility isn't so bad.
>
> Unless the thing changes purpose. *Then* backwards compatibility is pure
> liquid evil! >_<
Now, why would you ever want to /change/ a system, if not to reflect
certain changes in purpose? Thus, backwards compatibility is /always/
pure liquid evil :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |