POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Nameless : Re: Nameless Server Time
3 Sep 2024 17:17:23 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Nameless  
From: Orchid XP v8
Date: 8 Mar 2011 13:20:32
Message: <4d767370$1@news.povray.org>
On 08/03/2011 05:09 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> Poor performance is the exact opposite of scalability.
>
> I think it depends on whether you're talking about scalable at runtime
> or scalable at coding time. I.e., is it a question of how big a program
> you can write, or a question of how big a program you can run?

I've not seen it applied to code size. Usually it's applied to run-time 
performance. (E.g., if you have a program that uses an O(N^2) algorithm, 
it probably works just fine for 10 users, but it's going to fail 
spectacularly for 10,000,000 users. It does not "scale".)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.