Am 26.02.2011 00:35, schrieb Mike Raiford:

> Question regarding the Translucency specificer, does this replace, or
> simply augment the current (As of RC3) style? Sometimes its nice to be
> able to tweak both the scattering and the absorbing coefficients.

The old (RC3) syntax is gone. But you can still achieve the same results 
via tweaking of the pigment and translucency - they're just a more 
indirect (yet usually much easier) way of specifying the coefficients.

Post a reply to this message