POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Invisible: PureData : Re: Invisible: PureData Server Time
3 Sep 2024 19:19:28 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Invisible: PureData  
From: Warp
Date: 16 Feb 2011 13:35:28
Message: <4d5c18f0@news.povray.org>
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> You do. They just wrote into the standard that there's a header file that 
> comes with the compiler that says "Hey, when he says uint64_t, he means long 
> long unsigned int".

> You can't declare a 64-bit integer. You can use someone else's declaration 
> that the standard says gives you a 64-bit integer in terms of 
> compiler-dependent long long unsigned int sorts of things.

  Again with your fixation about "someone else's" declaration.

  Whether uint64_t is declared in a header file or whether it's a reserved
keyword supported by the compiler directly makes little difference. It's
*standard* in any case. You can use it safely.

  (And besides, nowhere it is said that 'long long' must be 64 bits in size.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.